Liberal Feminism

Constructive feminism has nothing to do with socialism or confrontation 
con el socialismo.

Social evolution shows that some situations, which today seem unacceptable, were natural in their day, such as slavery until the 19th century, racial alienation of coloured people in the USA until 1950, or women’s right to vote, which did not happen in Spain until 1933 and until 1945 in France. Not to mention the negative views there were of what was feminine by the likes of Cicero or Aristotle in Greek or Roman times. It should also be stated that, if evolution had been different, no-one could guarantee that we would be better off today. Evolution requires its own times, and excesses and forceful transits have boomerang effects. Every situation has its advantages and disadvantages. Positive discriminations are linguistic manipulation, they are unconstitutional and they are all negative. In Spain, they are totalitarian and interests in seeking electoral short cuts. Spanish socialism twists the meaning and changes names of concepts to deceive and take advantage, all its own benefit. They are evil, not stupid. By manipulating language and having mass media to serve it, the potential impact of propaganda is extremely strong. By repeating a lie, many end up believing that it is true. What advantage do they seek? People who are disinformed believe their fallacies and lies; youths are indoctrinated from Secondary Education; retired people believe their pension is safer if they vote them (while Spain’s debt is beyond control); people without culture who must work long hours to live precariously, only have time to survive. The list of fallacies is endless: they call many unemployed people discontinued permanent workers; they call paying taxes to use roadways rating per use after vehicle owners have already been charged many taxes; they apply the name democracy for a particracy that does not respect division of powers, whose party leader may be a bully or someone mentally ill, but can preside the national government without being checked in any way; they state that they defend the poor, but make citizens poorer and also make them depend on the State due to the amount of unemployment benefit and precariousness (twice that of Spain’s neighbours); they state that they defend citizen equality by overfunding separatist communities that are much wealthier than other non-separatist ones, like Extremadura. They even legislate unconstitutional laws from the power that breaks equality in the eyes of the law. While they attack any private business activity, their children attend private schools or hospitals. This discourse is so contradictory that the fact that millions of voters continue to vote for them just shows how many silly people there still are in Spain. Gender ideologies and attacks on the traditional family have invisible effects of solitude on not only citizens who are increasingly suffering from it, but also on the 11 youth suicides that take place every day. With no solid family structure, no religion, no spiritual values, nothing to hope for and no professional expectations, many people despair. While the UK has introduced a Ministry of Loneliness, we suffer the Ministry of “Equality”, which should really be known as the Ministry of “Confrontation of Sexes”. Positive discriminations, feminine quotes and zip lists are absurd, but evil. It will not be long now before socialists appear with nonsensical ideas, like doing away with age barriers in sexual relations or imposing a tax for good-looking people for discriminating the ugly. With the large number of fools there is in Spain, some will be happy to pay a tax to have a socialist certificate showing they are officially good-looking. Evolution to equal rights has to be achieved without force and without embarrassing anyone. Deliberate injustice above evolutionary injustice is no justice, but totalitarianism. Discriminations are never positive and they are all unconstitutional, even though they have been made legal by force. If there is only one home in, for example, a divorce, men end up on the street, but continue paying the mortgage for what used to be their home, and is now possibly lived in for free by a third party who replaces them emotionally. This frequent judicial legal decision unbalances many men. This discrimination of men by the law, along with bad education and irrational despair, leads to crimes. Positive discrimination in favour or women makes the partner violence against women problem worse because it makes the material situation of deranged males hard, who have also been educated to believe that love is forever and their partner belongs to them. Education in the so-called “equality”, which describes that all men are potential harassers and all women are victims of male chauvinism, does not solve the problem, but neither do exhibitions of LGTB pride. There are no heterosexual ostentations. Nor do womens’ forced quotes favour a worthy woman’s dignity. Socialists have an idea: the more deceived the women voting them, the better, even though the problem gets no better. The priority is that what they call male violence lasts and becomes as worse as possible to justify their fallacies. And so they come over as saviours by increasing budgets for their own people, who live from defending their feminism of confrontation. I am unaware if the mistakes with the “Yes is Yes” Law were unintentional or not. Is a different and well-accepted feminism possible? Obviously, a different feminism is possible, and it is not socialist. However, it is pointless expecting it because it is not a priority of PP either, which could implement it in the 13 Spanish Autonomous Communities where it governs. This communist PSOE wants the traditional family to disappear so that more citizens depend on the State to do away with the protective family shield. As pointed out, both feminism and the partner violence against women issue are matters of education, which could be taught to young boys and girls, say from 10 years of age, when they can understand it by stressing the professional and moral qualities of successful women (not those who live off professional politics to avoid ideologies and who come from the private sector), which they acquired from their professional development: sports women, business women, female restaurateurs (restaurants/hotels), and women who are judges, chefs, artists, scientists; lawyers and doctors, and who practice solidarity, etc. The more relevant they are, so much the better. These women could visit schools either in person or by virtual means, depending on their circumstances, to talk about what they studied, and about their experiences at school and in their profession. They could also employ videos. They could explain how they came to choose what they do, how they have overcome difficulties, how they rose up again after their first and important failure, how they have recovered, how they have made their activity important, what their motivations are. They could also explain how they chose their collaborators and employees, and how they practice teamwork. The idea is that children of both sexes admire women leaders and their qualities. Children surely admire their mothers, and come into contact with positive images and realities of women. Their words and experiences would leave a mark on boys and girls by women coming over as admirable, positive people. Moreover, these interviews held with successful professional women would awake vocations and cure the evil we witness. I refer to the fear of failure and not promoting professional training. In Spain, we avoid the business risk because education is impregnated with state control and subliminal socialism. This education is practiced by teachers who consciously or unconsciously diffuse state control and socialist ideas and, depending on the region where they teach, separatist ideas in their teaching of regional languages. These teachers are ideologised in a high proportion and indoctrinate students by encouraging public activities as opposed to private ones. These teachers’ attitude is gradually accepted by children who, when they arrive at university, are indoctrinated in not only socialist state control, but also in separatist and antipatriotic views. Very little entrepreneurship is done in Spain (50% of degree holders aged 18-50 years hope to become civil servants). This is because teachers diffuse state control and socialist/separatist governments promote public jobs for ideological purposes, which leaves Spain in debt and does away with private incentives. Spain moves towards communism, its public sector never ceases to grow and what is private is reduce, which is why debt and taxes never stop rising. In the USA for example, what you have accomplished professionally is much more highly valued than what you have studied, professional failures are perceived as positive experiences, and there is no blind trust in what is academic. What is more however, PhDs in Spain are neither recognised in salaries nor are valued because, to a great extent, the Spanish public university is ruled by quality standards that go against business interests. Public universities live in a bubble in which PhD are believed to be important only for university academic careers that are subject to rankings for fools. Quality standards are far-removed from business interests. The requirements used to evaluate PhDs students are impregnated with quantitative ideology, and to such an extent that they are measured as hours of work, which are considered favourable without considering business interests and risk. Can someone who has never taken a risk teach how to take risks? The obvious answer is no. Yet this does not only affect education, but the entrepreneurial culture is also scarce. When someone in the USA takes their business project to ask for credit, they are asked what they have failed in so as to not repeat the same mistakes. Then they are given credit to set up a business and red tape is simplified to facilitate the process. In Spain, the control and legal insecurity (17 different legislations, squatters in housing, high taxes) are socialist inspiration (except for the liberal oasis in the Spanish Autonomous Community of Madrid). An economic liberty ranking exists, but is never mentioned because the photo would be an embarrassment. PP leaders do not dare (save in Madrid), not even when PP has governed with an absolute majority, to contemplate the cultural battle of freedom and entrepreneurship, but the feminism with no victims or guilty parties that I have put forward can be promoted in private and state-aided schools firstly, and also in public ones, because it goes against nobody. Any reasonable family would accept it, but subsidised socialists/separatists and subsidised trade unionists would find ghosts in any non-State initiative and would classify it as “privatised” teaching.  

El voto de personas desinformadas que cree sus falacias y mentiras; jóvenes adoctrinados desde la secundaria; jubilados que creen que su pensión está más segura votándoles (mientras la deuda se desboca); personas sin cultura que deben trabajar muchas horas para vivir precariamente, y no tienen tiempo más que para sobrevivir. La lista de falacias es interminable: Llamar fijos discontinuos a muchos parados; el impuesto por uso de carreteras lo llaman tarificación por uso, habiendo cobrado ya muchos impuestos a los propietarios de coche; llaman democracia a una partidocracia que no respeta la división de poderes, donde el caudillo de partido puede ser un matón o enfermo mental, llega a la presidencia del Gobierno sin filtro alguno ; manifiestan defender a los pobres mientras empobrecen a los ciudadanos y los hace dependientes del Estado, por la cantidad de desempleo y precariedad (el doble que nuestros vecinos); declaran defender la igualdad del ciudadano sobre financiando a las comunidades separatistas que ya son más ricas que muchas otras no separatistas, como Extremadura. Incluso legislan desde el poder leyes inconstitucionales que quiebran la igualdad ante la ley. 

Atacan la actividad privada y sin embargo, llevan a sus hijos a colegios u hospitales privados. El discurso es tan contradictorio, que los millones de votos que todavía consiguen muestra cuántos estúpidos quedan todavía en España. Las ideologías de género, el ataque a la familia tradicional tiene efectos invisibles de soledad en ciudadanos que la padecen crecientemente, en los once suicidios diarios de jóvenes. Sin estructura familiar sólida, ni religión, ni valores espirituales, sin ilusiones ni expectativas profesionales muchas personas caen en el abismo. Mientras el Reino Unido introducen un ministerio de la Soledad, nosotros padecemos el ministerio de “Igualdad” que en realidad se debería llamar de “Enfrentamiento de sexos”.  

Las discriminaciones positivas, cuotas femeninas, listas cremallera, son absurdas, pero malvadas, no tardará en aparecer socialistas con ocurrencias disparatadas, como eliminar barreras de edad en relaciones sexuales o imponer impuesto a los guapos por discriminación de los feos. Con la cantidad de tontos que tenemos en España, algunos pagarían a gusto el impuesto por tener certificado socialista de guapo oficial. La evolución hacia la igualdad de derechos ha de conseguirse sin forzar, ni violentar a nadie. Injusticia deliberada sobre injusticia evolutiva no es justicia, sino totalitarismo. Las discriminaciones nunca son positivas, son inconstitucionales todas, aunque sean legales por imposición.  Si hay un solo hogar, en un caso de divorcio, por ejemplo,  el varón suele ir a la calle, sigue pagando la vivienda hogar que disfruta un tercero que le sustituye emocionalmente, gratis. Es una decisión judicial legal frecuente que desequilibra a muchos. Esta discriminación del varón ante la ley, junto con la mala educación y la desesperación irracional provoca crímenes.  La discriminación positiva a favor de la mujer agrava el problema de violencia entre parejas porque endurece la situación material de varones desquiciados, educados además creyendo que el amor es para siempre y que la pareja les pertenece. 

La educación en la llamada “igualdad” donde se describe a todo varón como un agresor potencial y toda mujer una víctima del machismo masculino, no alivia el problema, como tampoco lo hacen las exhibiciones del orgullo LGTBI. No hay ostentaciones heterosexuales. Las cuotas forzadas de mujeres tampoco favorece la dignidad de la mujer de valía.

Los socialistas tienen una idea: cuantas más mujeres engañadas les voten mejor, aunque no disminuya el problema. La prioridad es que la  lo que llaman violencia machista dure y se agrave lo más posible para justificar sus falacias y erigirse en salvadores, aumentar el presupuesto a sus afines que viven de defender su feminismo de enfrentamiento. Los errores de la ley del sólo si es si, no se si eran involuntarios.  ¿Es posible un feminismo diferente, mayoritariamente aceptado?

Claro que cabe un feminismo diferente, no socialista, pero no lo esperen porque no es prioridad del PP tampoco,  pudiéndolo implantar en las 13 autonomías donde gobierna. Este comunista PSOE quiere hacer desaparecer la familia tradicional para que haya más ciudadanos dependientes del Estado, para eliminar el escudo protector de la familia.

Como hemos indicado, tanto el feminismo, como el asunto de violencia contra la mujer, son asuntos de educación, y se podría inculcar en los niños y niñas, digamos desde los diez años, cuando son conscientes, ensalzando las cualidades profesionales y morales de mujeres de éxito (no dedicadas a la política profesional para evitar ideologías, y procedentes del sector privado) en su desarrollo profesional: deportistas, empresarias, restauradoras (hostelería), juezas, cocineras, artistas, científicas; abogadas, médicos, practicantes de solidaridad, … . Cuanto más relevantes mejor. Estas personas visitan el colegio presencialmente o telemáticamente, acorde a su disponibilidad, cuentan durante un tiempo lo que estudiaron y cómo fue su experiencia escolar y profesional. Pueden pasarse también videos.  Contarían cómo eligieron su actividad, superaron las dificultades, como se levantaron cuando tuvieron los primeros e importantes fracasos, cómo se recuperaron, cómo hicieron importante su actividad, sus motivaciones. Cómo eligieron a sus colaboradores, empleados y como practican el trabajo en equipo. Se trata de que los niños de ambos sexos admiren a mujeres líderes y sus cualidades. 

Los niños seguramente admiran a sus madres, tienen contacto con imágenes y realidades positivas de mujeres. Sus palabras y experiencias dejan huella en los niños y niñas, la mujer deviene una persona admirable, positiva. Además estas entrevistas con mujeres con éxito profesional despierta vocaciones y curaría de un gran mal que padecemos. Me refiero al miedo al fracaso y el descuido en la promoción de las vocaciones profesionales.

 En España padecemos una aversión al riesgo empresarial porque la educación está impregnada de estatismo y socialismo subliminal, practicada por un profesorado que consciente o inconscientemente difunde ideas estatistas, socialistas, y dependiendo del lugar, separatista a través de la enseñanza de las lenguas autóctonas, cuyos enseñantes en una elevada proporción están ideologizados y adoctrinan, fomentando la actividad pública versus la privada. Esta actitud del profesorado va calando en los niños y cuando llegan a la universidad están adoctrinados no sólo de estatismo socialista, sino separatista y antipatriótico. 

En España se emprende poco (la mitad de los titulados entre 18 y 50 años declara querer ser funcionario) porque el profesorado propaga estatismo y los Gobiernos socialistas/separatistas promueven el empleo público con fines ideológicos, endeudándonos hasta la ruina y aniquilando la iniciativa privada. España va camino del comunismo, el sector público crece sin freno y el privado disminuye. Por eso la deuda y los impuestos no dejan de crecer. En EE.UU por ejemplo, se valora profesionalmente más lo que has hecho que lo que has estudiado, los fracasos profesionales se ven como experiencia positiva, no se fían ciegamente de lo académico. 

Pero es que además, el doctorado en España no se reconoce en los salarios ni se valoran, en gran medida porque la universidad pública se rige por patrones de calidad que viven de espaldas a los interés empresariales. Las universidades públicas viven en una burbuja en la que creen que el doctorado sólo es importante para carreras académicas universitarias, pendientes de rankings para bobos. Los patrones de calidad son ajenos al interés empresarial, los requisitos para evaluar al doctorando están impregnados de ideología cuantitativa hasta el punto que se miden en horas de actividades que consideran favorables, ajenas a cualquier interés empresarial, y riesgo. ¿Puede enseñar a arriesgar quién no lo ha practicado nunca? Evidentemente no.

Pero es que no solamente es la educación, es la escasa cultura emprendedora. En EE.UU cuando va una persona con un proyecto empresarial a pedir un crédito, le preguntan en qué ha fracasado antes para evitar repetir los errores y le conceden un crédito para empezar un negocio, los trámites burocráticos se simplifican para facilitarlo. En España la regulación, la inseguridad jurídica (17 legislaciones, la ocupación de viviendas, impuestos elevados) son de inspiración socialista (con la excepción del oasis liberal de la comunidad de Madrid). Hay un ranking de libertad económica, pero de ese no se habla, porque no conviene la foto.

Los dirigentes del PP no se atreven  (salvo en Madrid) ni cuando gobiernan con mayoría absoluta a plantear la batalla cultural de la libertad y el emprendimiento, pero el feminismo sin víctimas ni culpables que he propuesto se puede fomentar en colegios privados y concertados en primer lugar, y en los públicos también, porque no va contra nadie. Cualquier familia razonable lo aceptaría, aunque los socialistas/separatistas y los sindicatos subvencionados, verán fantasmas en cualquier iniciativa no estatista y lo calificaran de “privatización”  de la enseñanza.