The breaking of bridges with VOX will politically bury Casado
Casado has again acted as the trusting zebra devoured by the PSOE crocodile when drinking at the censure motion river. Rajoy’s high-and-mighty model: no values, hoping that a leftwing government ruins the economy enough for voters to leave it and then obtain votes. That is no good for Casado because the government can use COVID-19 as an excuse, it has a majority thanks to the mass media that favour it, and this PSOE lies to everyone and allies with anyone. Only VOX-PP cooperation can defeat antipatriotic coalitions. Advisors have betrayed Casado or made him err by convincing him that the motion went against him by pushing him to the centre void. Casado has fallen in the trap with disconcerting speech. During his suicidal discourse, he intended to retake Rajoy’s expired model and eliminate VOX by lying about Abascal’s antiterrorist conduct by caricaturing differences and attributing to himself the absurd right to allies’ possible submission. By confusing rivals and breaking away from the necessary co-operator, he disconcerts voters, who do not understand the government’s totalitarian desires by abstaining with a vote and opposing with discourse. It is as though he would like to hear himself doing brilliant speeches that go against his actions. Publicly attacking a friend is betrayal, but is also clumsy if you need that friend. Being indulgent with totalitarians is cowardly tepidness. Ignoring that friend is immaturity. Casado plays the loser’s role and misses a two-party system. For all this, he wants to eliminate VOX and its 4 million voters. The two-party PSOE/PP system is shameful: major territorial inequalities, separatism, corruption, economic unsustainability, indoctrination at school, etc. Rajoy’s model has handed education over to PSOE, the cultural battle, the mass media and streets. Not confronting totalitarians is giving in. Harmony is no good when hunger queues lengthen. The government does not respect separation of powers, restricts freedom, salaries increase and Spanish is no longer the main language at school. Now is the time for the brave. Many PP voters will turn to VOX for being disappointed by Casado whose dialectic volatility has evidenced lack of leadership. Although he is not alone, he conceives his party like a job-placement agency. This is why he told Abascal that it had given him work for 15 years. By attacking Abascal, he intends to place PP in an empty centre, which has shrunk since Zapatero, given Spaniards’ permanent confrontation. Casado uses the same lie as the government and its media by accusing VOX of being extreme. Defending values, fighting the cultural battle and criticising EU mistakes are neither anti-European nor extremist. Defending legal male/female equality is not being male chauvinistic, but claiming justice. Wishing to regulate illegal immigration is not racist. The opposite of submissive is critical, not extremist. The main difference between VOX and PP is about the State’s size. After the next general elections, PP and VOX will be equal and “the political head of Casado will be questioned at 13 Génova Street, Madrid”, not only for an electoral disaster, but also for breaking links with Abascal. Casado’s verbal excesses would not allow him to continue in his job post. Casado confuses PP members because his actions fall in line with his beaten rival, Soraya, in PP primary elections. He deceives those who voted him in primary elections, his voters and Spaniards, but deceives himself. The proof of the pudding of Casado’s strategic failure is the conceited praises of Iglesias and Lastra. Rival sectarians flattering you is a bad omen. When it is of the government’s interest, he will be accused of being a fascist, and PP of cuts, nationalisations, corruption, the photo taken of leaders against the government, disloyalty in Europe, etc. Rome does not pay traitors. VOX should have the wisdom to look in the long term, convince the more conservative PP voters without taking advantage of others’ misfortune, show generosity without breaking links, promote possible changes, moderate its spokespersons and propose reducing public spending despite accusing him of being populist. The extractor State is surplus, the server State is lacking. Too much governmental power, but no private initiative.
Muchos votantes del PP se irán a VOX, defraudados por un Casado cuya volatilidad dialéctica evidencia falta de liderazgo. Aunque no es el único, concibe su partido como una agencia de colocación, por eso le dijo a Abascal, que le habían dado trabajo durante quince años. Atacando a Abascal pretende colocar al PP en un centro vaciado, muy encogido desde Zapatero, por el permanente enfrentamiento de los españoles. Casado usa la misma mentira del gobierno y sus medios, acusando a VOX de extremista. Defender valores, disputar la batalla cultural, criticar fallos de la UE, no es ser ni antieuropeo ni extremista. Defender la igualdad legal hombre/mujer no es ser machista, es reclamar Justicia. Querer regular la inmigración ilegal no es ser racista. Lo contrario de sumiso es crítico, no extremista. La principal diferencia entre VOX y el PP es sobre el tamaño del Estado.
Después de las próximas elecciones generales, el PP y VOX estarán igualados y “la cabeza política de Casado se cuestionará en Génova 13”, no solo por el debacle electoral, también por la rotura de puentes con Abascal. Los excesos verbales de Casado, le imposibilitarán para continuar en el cargo. Casado confunde a los afiliados del PP, porque su actuación sintoniza con su derrotada rival, Soraya, en las primarias del PP. Engaña a los que le votaron en primarias, a sus votantes, a los españoles y se engaña a si mismo.
La prueba del algodón del fallo estratégico de Casado, son los pedantes elogios de Iglesias y Lastra. Mal presagio que sectarios adversarios te adulen. Cuando le interese, el gobierno, le acusará de fascista y al PP de recortes, privatizaciones, corrupción, la foto de Colón, deslealtad en Europa… Roma no paga a traidores. VOX debería tener la sabiduría de mirar largo, convencer a los votantes mas conservadores del PP sin hacer leña del árbol caído, generosidad sin romper puentes, promover cambios posibles, moderar a sus portavoces y proponer la disminución de gasto político, aunque le acusen de populista. Sobra Estado extractor, escasea el Estado servidor. Sobra poder gubernamental, falta iniciativa privada.