The delinquent needs two things: to dare and to justify himself; The former is more frequent in the male because he is more trained, due to the evolution and practice of war and hunting.
We are unaware of natural species selection if the leadership of previous tribes had featured a woman instead of a man; she looked after, cooperated and kept the home of him who fought, competed and hunted. Perhaps we would not speak of it today. The Western canon values individual freedom more than group security. Species evolution has developed by means of distributing roles; women did domestic work, gave care, while men’s work was related more to agression, war, hunting. Leadership was a priority of the stronger, of men. Our ancestors’ priority was security versus freedom and equality. This also occurs in today’s less individualist oriental societies, like China. They better manage the pandemic and move towards world hegemony. Chinese leaders are mostly male; it has been demonstrated that cultural habits are genetically transmitted. We are social beings of habits. We are reluctant to changes, innovations. Words, thought, education are vectors of social change. The ambition of power drives to taking totalitarian short cuts using propaganda to gain ill-informed people’s votes.
“Progressive” feminism feeds artificial man-woman confrontation. Male chauvinism comes from deficient sentimental education, which allows some men to view women as male “property”. Badly proportioned “progressive” legal asymmetry favours women, when partner relationships break, which worsens sentimental sick people, generally men, by materially cornering them. Desperately, with no emotional or material options, some take to crime. Spinoza discovered 350 years ago that humans are more emotional than rational. Sick people need better education and help, and not enrage against it; as their behaviour is irrational, the legal asymmetry is no good. Wishing to appear fairer without being fair is the worse injustice. Swords cannot provide what books cannot give. If an advantage exists, human weakness takes advantage of it with, for example, false claims. So gender laws are unfair. The “Calvente” case has demonstrated false sexual harassment claims by Podemos Party leaders. Ministerial marriages do not seem exemplary. The Spanish Ministry of Equality finances organisations that serve gender propaganda to gain gullible people’s votes.
Defending the equality of men/women rights requires no guilty parties. Cultural habits genetically transmit a higher aggressiveness potential to males with its pros and cons. A soldier, a sportsperson, someone in an emergency situation, an expired business opportunity. They all need quick, instant decisions, an emotional urge that appreciates aggressiveness. This potential advantage in unforeseeable or emergency situations, this decisive urge, can also make someone move more willingly to crime. Because, according to Bandura, two things are needed to commit crime: moral disengagement and audacity. Moral disengagement justifies that criminals need to self-accept despite the harm they cause. This factor seems to have less to do with evolution, but audacity has; in genetic and evolution terms, males are better practiced in quick decision making when hunting dangerous animals, fighting and defending from enemies. So women are generally less criminally daring, have more social shame for being discovered and are untrained in this risk. They also tend to perform less corruption, which would lower if a higher percentage of women participated in politics.
Un estudio reciente demuestra que, la mayor participación de las mujeres en la administración local en India mejora la calidad de vida, la educación y sanidad.
Con más mujeres dirigentes, tendríamos menos guerras y corrupción, la natalidad y los cuidados estarían mejor comprendidos, se pactaría más. Sólo por esto nos convendría a todos su mayor protagonismo. Darwin creía que no es la fuerza ni la inteligencia, lo que hace hegemónica una especie, sino su mejor adaptabilidad a los cambios. Es falso que el varón sea enemigo de la mujer, no conozco a ninguno. El mejor gobierno debe buscar un equilibrio natural que atienda a capacidades y vocación de las personas, no a cuotas.
Artículo publicado en Las Provincias