{"id":501,"date":"2023-08-28T07:48:04","date_gmt":"2023-08-28T07:48:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/?p=501"},"modified":"2023-08-28T07:48:05","modified_gmt":"2023-08-28T07:48:05","slug":"feminismo-liberal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/en\/feminismo-liberal\/","title":{"rendered":"Liberal Feminism"},"content":{"rendered":"

Constructive feminism has nothing to do with socialism or confrontation\u00a0
con el socialismo.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Social evolution shows that some situations, which today seem unacceptable, were natural in their day, such as slavery until the 19th century, racial alienation of coloured people in the USA until 1950, or women\u2019s right to vote, which did not happen in Spain until 1933 and until 1945 in France. Not to mention the negative views there were of what was feminine by the likes of Cicero or Aristotle in Greek or Roman times. It should also be stated that, if evolution had been different, no-one could guarantee that we would be better off today. Evolution requires its own times, and excesses and forceful transits have boomerang effects. Every situation has its advantages and disadvantages. Positive discriminations are linguistic manipulation, they are unconstitutional and they are all negative. In Spain, they are totalitarian and interests in seeking electoral short cuts. Spanish socialism twists the meaning and changes names of concepts to deceive and take advantage, all its own benefit. They are evil, not stupid. By manipulating language and having mass media to serve it, the potential impact of propaganda is extremely strong. By repeating a lie, many end up believing that it is true. What advantage do they seek? \n\nPeople who are disinformed believe their fallacies and lies; youths are indoctrinated from Secondary Education; retired people believe their pension is safer if they vote them (while Spain\u2019s debt is beyond control); people without culture who must work long hours to live precariously, only have time to survive. The list of fallacies is endless: they call many unemployed people discontinued permanent workers; they call paying taxes to use roadways rating per use after vehicle owners have already been charged many taxes; they apply the name democracy for a particracy that does not respect division of powers, whose party leader may be a bully or someone mentally ill, but can preside the national government without being checked in any way; they state that they defend the poor, but make citizens poorer and also make them depend on the State due to the amount of unemployment benefit and precariousness (twice that of Spain\u2019s neighbours); they state that they defend citizen equality by overfunding separatist communities that are much wealthier than other non-separatist ones, like Extremadura. They even legislate unconstitutional laws from the power that breaks equality in the eyes of the law. \n\nWhile they attack any private business activity, their children attend private schools or hospitals. This discourse is so contradictory that the fact that millions of voters continue to vote for them just shows how many silly people there still are in Spain. Gender ideologies and attacks on the traditional family have invisible effects of solitude on not only citizens who are increasingly suffering from it, but also on the 11 youth suicides that take place every day. With no solid family structure, no religion, no spiritual values, nothing to hope for and no professional expectations, many people despair. While the UK has introduced a Ministry of Loneliness, we suffer the Ministry of \u201cEquality\u201d, which should really be known as the Ministry of \u201cConfrontation of Sexes\u201d. \n\nPositive discriminations, feminine quotes and zip lists are absurd, but evil. It will not be long now before socialists appear with nonsensical ideas, like doing away with age barriers in sexual relations or imposing a tax for good-looking people for discriminating the ugly. With the large number of fools there is in Spain, some will be happy to pay a tax to have a socialist certificate showing they are officially good-looking. Evolution to equal rights has to be achieved without force and without embarrassing anyone. Deliberate injustice above evolutionary injustice is no justice, but totalitarianism. Discriminations are never positive and they are all unconstitutional, even though they have been made legal by force. If there is only one home in, for example, a divorce, men end up on the street, but continue paying the mortgage for what used to be their home, and is now possibly lived in for free by a third party who replaces them emotionally. This frequent judicial legal decision unbalances many men. This discrimination of men by the law, along with bad education and irrational despair, leads to crimes. Positive discrimination in favour or women makes the partner violence against women problem worse because it makes the material situation of deranged males hard, who have also been educated to believe that love is forever and their partner belongs to them. \n\nEducation in the so-called \u201cequality\u201d, which describes that all men are potential harassers and all women are victims of male chauvinism, does not solve the problem, but neither do exhibitions of LGTB pride. There are no heterosexual ostentations. Nor do womens\u2019 forced quotes favour a worthy woman\u2019s dignity.\n\nSocialists have an idea: the more deceived the women voting them, the better, even though the problem gets no better. The priority is that what they call male violence lasts and becomes as worse as possible to justify their fallacies. And so they come over as saviours by increasing budgets for their own people, who live from defending their feminism of confrontation. I am unaware if the mistakes with the \u201cYes is Yes\u201d Law were unintentional or not. Is a different and well-accepted feminism possible?\n\nObviously, a different feminism is possible, and it is not socialist. However, it is pointless expecting it because it is not a priority of PP either, which could implement it in the 13 Spanish Autonomous Communities where it governs. This communist PSOE wants the traditional family to disappear so that more citizens depend on the State to do away with the protective family shield.\n\nAs pointed out, both feminism and the partner violence against women issue are matters of education, which could be taught to young boys and girls, say from 10 years of age, when they can understand it by stressing the professional and moral qualities of successful women (not those who live off professional politics to avoid ideologies and who come from the private sector), which they acquired from their professional development: sports women, business women, female restaurateurs (restaurants\/hotels), and women who are judges, chefs, artists, scientists; lawyers and doctors, and who practice solidarity, etc. The more relevant they are, so much the better. These women could visit schools either in person or by virtual means, depending on their circumstances, to talk about what they studied, and about their experiences at school and in their profession. They could also employ videos. They could explain how they came to choose what they do, how they have overcome difficulties, how they rose up again after their first and important failure, how they have recovered, how they have made their activity important, what their motivations are. They could also explain how they chose their collaborators and employees, and how they practice teamwork. The idea is that children of both sexes admire women leaders and their qualities. \n\nChildren surely admire their mothers, and come into contact with positive images and realities of women. Their words and experiences would leave a mark on boys and girls by women coming over as admirable, positive people. Moreover, these interviews held with successful professional women would awake vocations and cure the evil we witness. I refer to the fear of failure and not promoting professional training.\n\nIn Spain, we avoid the business risk because education is impregnated with state control and subliminal socialism. This education is practiced by teachers who consciously or unconsciously diffuse state control and socialist ideas and, depending on the region where they teach, separatist ideas in their teaching of regional languages. These teachers are ideologised in a high proportion and indoctrinate students by encouraging public activities as opposed to private ones. These teachers\u2019 attitude is gradually accepted by children who, when they arrive at university, are indoctrinated in not only socialist state control, but also in separatist and antipatriotic views. \n\nVery little entrepreneurship is done in Spain (50% of degree holders aged 18-50 years hope to become civil servants). This is because teachers diffuse state control and socialist\/separatist governments promote public jobs for ideological purposes, which leaves Spain in debt and does away with private incentives. Spain moves towards communism, its public sector never ceases to grow and what is private is reduce, which is why debt and taxes never stop rising. In the USA for example, what you have accomplished professionally is much more highly valued than what you have studied, professional failures are perceived as positive experiences, and there is no blind trust in what is academic. \n\nWhat is more however, PhDs in Spain are neither recognised in salaries nor are valued because, to a great extent, the Spanish public university is ruled by quality standards that go against business interests. Public universities live in a bubble in which PhD are believed to be important only for university academic careers that are subject to rankings for fools. Quality standards are far-removed from business interests. The requirements used to evaluate PhDs students are impregnated with quantitative ideology, and to such an extent that they are measured as hours of work, which are considered favourable without considering business interests and risk. Can someone who has never taken a risk teach how to take risks? The obvious answer is no.\n\nYet this does not only affect education, but the entrepreneurial culture is also scarce. When someone in the USA takes their business project to ask for credit, they are asked what they have failed in so as to not repeat the same mistakes. Then they are given credit to set up a business and red tape is simplified to facilitate the process. In Spain, the control and legal insecurity (17 different legislations, squatters in housing, high taxes) are socialist inspiration (except for the liberal oasis in the Spanish Autonomous Community of Madrid). An economic liberty ranking exists, but is never mentioned because the photo would be an embarrassment.\n\nPP leaders do not dare (save in Madrid), not even when PP has governed with an absolute majority, to contemplate the cultural battle of freedom and entrepreneurship, but the feminism with no victims or guilty parties that I have put forward can be promoted in private and state-aided schools firstly, and also in public ones, because it goes against nobody. Any reasonable family would accept it, but subsidised socialists\/separatists and subsidised trade unionists would find ghosts in any non-State initiative and would classify it as \u201cprivatised\u201d teaching.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

El voto de personas desinformadas que cree sus falacias y mentiras; j\u00f3venes adoctrinados desde la secundaria; jubilados que creen que su pensi\u00f3n est\u00e1 m\u00e1s segura vot\u00e1ndoles (mientras la deuda se desboca); personas sin cultura que deben trabajar muchas horas para vivir precariamente, y no tienen tiempo m\u00e1s que para sobrevivir. La lista de falacias es interminable: Llamar fijos discontinuos a muchos parados; el impuesto por uso de carreteras lo llaman tarificaci\u00f3n por uso, habiendo cobrado ya muchos impuestos a los propietarios de coche; llaman democracia a una partidocracia que no respeta la divisi\u00f3n de poderes, donde el caudillo de partido puede ser un mat\u00f3n o enfermo mental, llega a la presidencia del Gobierno sin filtro alguno ; manifiestan defender a los pobres mientras empobrecen a los ciudadanos y los hace dependientes del Estado, por la cantidad de desempleo y precariedad (el doble que nuestros vecinos); declaran defender la igualdad del ciudadano sobre financiando a las comunidades separatistas que ya son m\u00e1s ricas que muchas otras no separatistas, como Extremadura. Incluso legislan desde el poder leyes inconstitucionales que quiebran la igualdad ante la ley. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Atacan la actividad privada y sin embargo, llevan a sus hijos a colegios u hospitales privados. El discurso es tan contradictorio, que los millones de votos que todav\u00eda consiguen muestra cu\u00e1ntos est\u00fapidos quedan todav\u00eda en Espa\u00f1a. Las ideolog\u00edas de g\u00e9nero, el ataque a la familia tradicional tiene efectos invisibles de soledad en ciudadanos que la padecen crecientemente, en los once suicidios diarios de j\u00f3venes. Sin estructura familiar s\u00f3lida, ni religi\u00f3n, ni valores espirituales, sin ilusiones ni expectativas profesionales muchas personas caen en el abismo. Mientras el Reino Unido introducen un ministerio de la Soledad, nosotros padecemos el ministerio de \u201cIgualdad\u201d que en realidad se deber\u00eda llamar de \u201cEnfrentamiento de sexos\u201d.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Las discriminaciones positivas, cuotas femeninas, listas cremallera, son absurdas, pero malvadas, no tardar\u00e1 en aparecer socialistas con ocurrencias disparatadas, como eliminar barreras de edad en relaciones sexuales o imponer impuesto a los guapos por discriminaci\u00f3n de los feos. Con la cantidad de tontos que tenemos en Espa\u00f1a, algunos pagar\u00edan a gusto el impuesto por tener certificado socialista de guapo oficial. La evoluci\u00f3n hacia la igualdad de derechos ha de conseguirse sin forzar, ni violentar a nadie. Injusticia deliberada sobre injusticia evolutiva no es justicia, sino totalitarismo. Las discriminaciones nunca son positivas, son inconstitucionales todas, aunque sean legales por imposici\u00f3n.  Si hay un solo hogar, en un caso de divorcio, por ejemplo,  el var\u00f3n suele ir a la calle, sigue pagando la vivienda hogar que disfruta un tercero que le sustituye emocionalmente, gratis. Es una decisi\u00f3n judicial legal frecuente que desequilibra a muchos. Esta discriminaci\u00f3n del var\u00f3n ante la ley, junto con la mala educaci\u00f3n y la desesperaci\u00f3n irracional provoca cr\u00edmenes.  La discriminaci\u00f3n positiva a favor de la mujer agrava el problema de violencia entre parejas porque endurece la situaci\u00f3n material de varones desquiciados, educados adem\u00e1s creyendo que el amor es para siempre y que la pareja les pertenece. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

La educaci\u00f3n en la llamada \u201cigualdad\u201d donde se describe a todo var\u00f3n como un agresor potencial y toda mujer una v\u00edctima del machismo masculino, no alivia el problema, como tampoco lo hacen las exhibiciones del orgullo LGTBI. No hay ostentaciones heterosexuales. Las cuotas forzadas de mujeres tampoco favorece la dignidad de la mujer de val\u00eda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Los socialistas tienen una idea: cuantas m\u00e1s mujeres enga\u00f1adas les voten mejor, aunque no disminuya el problema. La prioridad es que la  lo que llaman violencia machista dure y se agrave lo m\u00e1s posible para justificar sus falacias y erigirse en salvadores, aumentar el presupuesto a sus afines que viven de defender su feminismo de enfrentamiento. Los errores de la ley del s\u00f3lo si es si, no se si eran involuntarios.  \u00bfEs posible un feminismo diferente, mayoritariamente aceptado?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Claro que cabe un feminismo diferente, no socialista, pero no lo esperen porque no es prioridad del PP tampoco,  pudi\u00e9ndolo implantar en las 13 autonom\u00edas donde gobierna. Este comunista PSOE quiere hacer desaparecer la familia tradicional para que haya m\u00e1s ciudadanos dependientes del Estado, para eliminar el escudo protector de la familia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Como hemos indicado, tanto el feminismo, como el asunto de violencia contra la mujer, son asuntos de educaci\u00f3n, y se podr\u00eda inculcar en los ni\u00f1os y ni\u00f1as, digamos desde los diez a\u00f1os, cuando son conscientes, ensalzando las cualidades profesionales y morales de mujeres de \u00e9xito (no dedicadas a la pol\u00edtica profesional para evitar ideolog\u00edas, y procedentes del sector privado) en su desarrollo profesional: deportistas, empresarias, restauradoras (hosteler\u00eda), juezas, cocineras, artistas, cient\u00edficas; abogadas, m\u00e9dicos, practicantes de solidaridad, \u2026 . Cuanto m\u00e1s relevantes mejor. Estas personas visitan el colegio presencialmente o telem\u00e1ticamente, acorde a su disponibilidad, cuentan durante un tiempo lo que estudiaron y c\u00f3mo fue su experiencia escolar y profesional. Pueden pasarse tambi\u00e9n videos.  Contar\u00edan c\u00f3mo eligieron su actividad, superaron las dificultades, como se levantaron cuando tuvieron los primeros e importantes fracasos, c\u00f3mo se recuperaron, c\u00f3mo hicieron importante su actividad, sus motivaciones. C\u00f3mo eligieron a sus colaboradores, empleados y como practican el trabajo en equipo. Se trata de que los ni\u00f1os de ambos sexos admiren a mujeres l\u00edderes y sus cualidades. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Los ni\u00f1os seguramente admiran a sus madres, tienen contacto con im\u00e1genes y realidades positivas de mujeres. Sus palabras y experiencias dejan huella en los ni\u00f1os y ni\u00f1as, la mujer deviene una persona admirable, positiva. Adem\u00e1s estas entrevistas con mujeres con \u00e9xito profesional despierta vocaciones y curar\u00eda de un gran mal que padecemos. Me refiero al miedo al fracaso y el descuido en la promoci\u00f3n de las vocaciones profesionales.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 En Espa\u00f1a padecemos una aversi\u00f3n al riesgo empresarial porque la educaci\u00f3n est\u00e1 impregnada de estatismo y socialismo subliminal, practicada por un profesorado que consciente o inconscientemente difunde ideas estatistas, socialistas, y dependiendo del lugar, separatista a trav\u00e9s de la ense\u00f1anza de las lenguas aut\u00f3ctonas, cuyos ense\u00f1antes en una elevada proporci\u00f3n est\u00e1n ideologizados y adoctrinan, fomentando la actividad p\u00fablica versus la privada. Esta actitud del profesorado va calando en los ni\u00f1os y cuando llegan a la universidad est\u00e1n adoctrinados no s\u00f3lo de estatismo socialista, sino separatista y antipatri\u00f3tico. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

En Espa\u00f1a se emprende poco (la mitad de los titulados entre 18 y 50 a\u00f1os declara querer ser funcionario) porque el profesorado propaga estatismo y los Gobiernos socialistas\/separatistas promueven el empleo p\u00fablico con fines ideol\u00f3gicos, endeud\u00e1ndonos hasta la ruina y aniquilando la iniciativa privada. Espa\u00f1a va camino del comunismo, el sector p\u00fablico crece sin freno y el privado disminuye. Por eso la deuda y los impuestos no dejan de crecer. En EE.UU por ejemplo, se valora profesionalmente m\u00e1s lo que has hecho que lo que has estudiado, los fracasos profesionales se ven como experiencia positiva, no se f\u00edan ciegamente de lo acad\u00e9mico. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pero es que adem\u00e1s, el doctorado en Espa\u00f1a no se reconoce en los salarios ni se valoran, en gran medida porque la universidad p\u00fablica se rige por patrones de calidad que viven de espaldas a los inter\u00e9s empresariales. Las universidades p\u00fablicas viven en una burbuja en la que creen que el doctorado s\u00f3lo es importante para carreras acad\u00e9micas universitarias, pendientes de rankings para bobos. Los patrones de calidad son ajenos al inter\u00e9s empresarial, los requisitos para evaluar al doctorando est\u00e1n impregnados de ideolog\u00eda cuantitativa hasta el punto que se miden en horas de actividades que consideran favorables, ajenas a cualquier inter\u00e9s empresarial, y riesgo. \u00bfPuede ense\u00f1ar a arriesgar qui\u00e9n no lo ha practicado nunca? Evidentemente no.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pero es que no solamente es la educaci\u00f3n, es la escasa cultura emprendedora. En EE.UU cuando va una persona con un proyecto empresarial a pedir un cr\u00e9dito, le preguntan en qu\u00e9 ha fracasado antes para evitar repetir los errores y le conceden un cr\u00e9dito para empezar un negocio, los tr\u00e1mites burocr\u00e1ticos se simplifican para facilitarlo. En Espa\u00f1a la regulaci\u00f3n, la inseguridad jur\u00eddica (17 legislaciones, la ocupaci\u00f3n de viviendas, impuestos elevados) son de inspiraci\u00f3n socialista (con la excepci\u00f3n del oasis liberal de la comunidad de Madrid). Hay un ranking de libertad econ\u00f3mica, pero de ese no se habla, porque no conviene la foto.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Los dirigentes del PP no se atreven  (salvo en Madrid) ni cuando gobiernan con mayor\u00eda absoluta a plantear la batalla cultural de la libertad y el emprendimiento, pero el feminismo sin v\u00edctimas ni culpables que he propuesto se puede fomentar en colegios privados y concertados en primer lugar, y en los p\u00fablicos tambi\u00e9n, porque no va contra nadie. Cualquier familia razonable lo aceptar\u00eda, aunque los socialistas\/separatistas y los sindicatos subvencionados, ver\u00e1n fantasmas en cualquier iniciativa no estatista y lo calificaran de \u201cprivatizaci\u00f3n\u201d  de la ense\u00f1anza.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

El\u00a0feminismo constructivo no tiene nada que ver ni con enfrentamientos ni\u00a0con el socialismo. La evoluci\u00f3n social muestra que situaciones que hoy nos parecen inasumibles eran naturales en su momento, como la esclavitud hasta el siglo XIX, la marginaci\u00f3n racial de la raza negra en USA hasta 1950, o el derecho al voto femenino, que no … Read more<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-501","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sociedad"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=501"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":502,"href":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501\/revisions\/502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/disidenciadigital.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}